I like the name but I dont see how a ghost eevee would work. Technically you'd have to kill the Eevee or something...
Uh... no? Ghost-type Pokemon aren't dead, they just have ghostly attributes. I mean, what else are you going to call a creature that passes through solid objects?
[quote author=Michieru link=topic=1323.msg55078#msg55078 date=1207092062]
or like make it hate you and level it up holding a ghost item.
Actually... that would be interesting... level an eevee and have it hold a ghost item and have it faint in a Ghost Tower or something. Now that would be an interesting twist.
[/quote]
That's exactly what I had in mind, actually. That's why it's called a "Frustration Evo." Frustration also requires an unhappy Pokemon. And since it doesn't evolve like that already having it hold an item is more or less implied. I suggest an item that continuously lowers its happiness, or at least prevents it from rising.
[quote author=Michieru link=topic=1323.msg55133#msg55133 date=1207115925]
Ugh... I am absolutely ruing finding out what the next Normal/Flying Pokemon will be... i wish they would just STOP making them. Then again I think i figured out why all flying pokemon need another class. I think it's because in order for them to use a move that ISN'T a flying type move... they need to be another class. (besides Steel Wing or other Wing/Air moves i guess) but also if something is just Flying Type...wouldn't that technically just make it Air or something? Think about it... alot of other games have flying enemies but they arent usually just flying either. (unless they are an Air Elemental or something like that.) I think the reason the creators of Pokemon havent made a true Flying pokemon... EVER... is because that would technically have to be something that never lands or something. So i'd say it'd either have to be like.. a ledendary pokemon. (like an Air Elemental or something)
[/quote]
A lot of Pokemon can use techniques not of their type, particularly Normal-types. But, yeah, I think Flying-types exist solely to be able to fly. If they had Abilities back then, "Flying" would've been one of them.
[quote author=Dark Shocktail link=topic=1323.msg55274#msg55274 date=1207223033]
There was a hoax cheat (the author had made it up for fun) in the first gen that involved a "teenage, rocker looking" male Kangashkan evo. I'd love to see the baby Kangaskhan, then a split for "teenage" evos for males and females, followed by the adult forms. Kinda like the Nidoran family, but it starts from the same baby Pokemon.
[/quote]
That's an interesting thought. Why
isn't there a Kangaskahn prevo already? Ever since breeding was introduced, Kangaskahns have been
born with "baby" Kangaskahns in their pouches. Did that
ever make sense? Or are we expected to assume that when the baby hatches a level 5 adult swoops in and pockets it?
[quote author=Tim link=topic=1323.msg55307#msg55307 date=1207260120]
Type: Ghost/Steel
Species: Haunted Armor Pokemon
Egg Group: Intermediate/Mineral
Levels: Doesn't Level Up
Description: The Haunted Armor Pokemon. It uses its Lance to scare off intruders from its territory.
[/quote]
Um... I assume by "Doesn't level up" you mean it doesn't evolve...