Yoshimitsu said:Well, I'm more suspicious of Belle now. Jerty was the first person to cast doubt on her, and suddenly he's been lynched? That sounds mighty suspicious to me.
Teapot said:Let's not do that. Mass sharing of information wrecked this game before, which is why I'm always quick to jump on it these days. Plus, you absolutely cannot trust what people send you anyway.
Keep it to this thread. No posting role PMs at all, public or private. Working together with other people for the good of your faction is fine, but mass destabilisation of the game makes it not fun.
* Under no circumstances shall you reveal your identity to anyone outside of the thread via screenshots. You may, however, reveal your identity in public or in private, as long as it does not contravene the above rule. If in doubt, PM me and ask!
Belle, your wit has no end. Best quote of the game? I think so.Belle said:You say "stab-happy", I say "productive".
I said no posting role PMs - ie, no screencapping. You're allowed to tell people your role as much as you like, as long as it isn't definitive proof. The point is the trust thing; giving people unparalleled proof isn't fun, but saying "ohai I'm detective" is. You can't be trusted, there.Linkachu said:Teapot said:No posting role PMs at all
Admin note (aka. abusing powers ): I noticed that your current set of rules does not say it's against the rules to reveal your role in private. You actually stated that it's okay to do so as long as people aren't taking screenshots of their initial role PMs.
If you don't want people revealing their roles privately at all, you should probably update your rules again. NidoRich technically wasn't breaking any rules.
Linkachu said:P.S. - Lynch Sem because he's Sem.
Belle said:But, and this may just be me speaking from experience, I think it would be incredibly stupid of me to kill someone the day after they had accused me of being mafia. And, if you recall, a very similar set-up was executed in the last game, with Karu being the victim in question.
Belle said:You say "stab-happy", I say "productive".
As we've already seen and observed, abstaining on the first day did nothing for us - and it never does. Everyone agreeing to do nothing does not instigate the debate, nor does it bring to light any suspicions or draw any defenses from players.
Round two was more of the same, the only difference being that were were down an innocent from the previous day, and now today we are seeing even mooooore baseless accusations following the swift lynching of a newbie based on the premise that she was new.
Cool.
But, and this may just be me speaking from experience, I think it would be incredibly stupid of me to kill someone the day after they had accused me of being mafia. And, if you recall, a very similar set-up was executed in the last game, with Karu being the victim in question.
Besides, who else remembers how long I kept Katie around, even though I had been a member of both mafia families?
i mean dang.
Yoshimitsu said:Belle said:You say "stab-happy", I say "productive".
As we've already seen and observed, abstaining on the first day did nothing for us - and it never does. Everyone agreeing to do nothing does not instigate the debate, nor does it bring to light any suspicions or draw any defenses from players.
Round two was more of the same, the only difference being that were were down an innocent from the previous day, and now today we are seeing even mooooore baseless accusations following the swift lynching of a newbie based on the premise that she was new.
Cool.
But, and this may just be me speaking from experience, I think it would be incredibly stupid of me to kill someone the day after they had accused me of being mafia. And, if you recall, a very similar set-up was executed in the last game, with Karu being the victim in question.
Besides, who else remembers how long I kept Katie around, even though I had been a member of both mafia families?
i mean dang.
I dunno, I don't buy it. Just because it's "incredibly stupid" doesn't mean you wouldn't have done it. In fact, you might even have done it to try to shift the blame away from you and claim to be a scapegoat! You're the criminal mastermind this game, it's totally something you would have done ;3
I'm pretty certain now about my assumption so I'm gonna Lynch Belle (ps ilu Belle)
yoshimitsu said:Must admit, I don't find JadaStark nearly as suspicious as, say, Tan or Belle who had flimsy reasoning at best. For now, I'm gonna vote for Belle for jumping to conclusions on a bandwagon ;3
Yoshimitsu said:Well, I'm more suspicious of Belle now. Jerty was the first person to cast doubt on her, and suddenly he's been lynched? That sounds mighty suspicious to me.
Yoshimitsu said:I'm pretty certain now about my assumption so I'm gonna Lynch Belle (ps ilu Belle)
Belle said:I mean it seems like kind of a stretch to pull some kind of sick ass DOUBLE REACHAROUND just to
just to...
no seriously what could I possibly stand to gain from killing Jerty in the night?
I know my arguments are better, I never felt threatened by those weaksauce accusations.
And if you guys are really giving me as much credit as you say (oh gosh blusshu blusshu), wouldn't it be smarter to pick off the stronger, more vocal players that I would legitimately find threatening if I were a member of the mafia?
Seems to meeeeeeee like someone is drawing attention away from themselves by pushing for a bandwagon.
As it is, El, I'm just so, so certain that you're mafia that I don't even know what to do with mys- oh no wait yes I do
I can vote to lynch El
(p.s. babbu ilu2 let's never fight again lynch lynch lynch)
Luckii said:Other than that, Sem was all too happy to lynch,
Tangrow said:I vote El ♥
Which may/may not have something to do with him totally killing me off that time I played ♥
Sem said:Luckii said:Other than that, Sem was all too happy to lynch,
Oh, trust me - I'malways all too happy to lynch. I unfortunately can't do it willy-nilly.
My thoughts exactly.Sem said:I like how suddenly killing smart people is a good idea. There's dumb people for you - oholololololo
Belle said:and also Dem, because even though ilu Dem, killing off the 'smart' players is just a poor course of action and if anything makes me suspicious that the two of you are in cahoots, whatever alignment you may turn out to be.